Florida Suit Claims OpenAI Received Safety Warnings About Children and Continued

OpenAI received safety warnings about child safety risks in its products. The warnings came from internal sources and external researchers. OpenAI continued operating the products. No one disputes this sequence.
Every company receives warnings about every system. Warnings are filed. Warning-receipt is tracked in compliance reports. The gap between warning and action is treated as a timeline problem, not a decision problem. Documentation of the warning proves the warning was known. It does not prove what knowing should have produced.
The suit will establish that OpenAI knew. Knowledge is not currently actionable under law. By the time law catches up, the products will have changed names or been succeeded by products with different risk profiles, against which the old warnings will not technically apply.